Empire: Total War Reviews


Empire: Total War Review

After years of wait, Empire: Total War has finally invaded PCs around the world. But did it deliver as promised? Strategy Informer finds out...

Member reviews Add review

Bad · by nikola1010 ·

Game is good on the battlefield, but the campaign map is apsolutley horrible, uncomprehensible, confuzing, the building system is horrible, building icons are also very badly done. As a total war fan I'm horribly dissapointed by this game, it's only good for battles, nothing else. One bright side are the sea battles, but that's it :(

0 0
Excellent in battle tactics · by Aris32 ·

The best in this game is your ability to replenish your troops after a battle without going back to the barracks.It should though have more units in order to be much more intriguing.A great game but you should expect heavy losses in many of your winning battles.

0 0
Excellent as usual, but.... · by paelleon ·

No doubts, the TOTAL WAR series are among the best strategic games ever. I played all of them and this last is not the exception. All units and politic enviroment are historically reconstructed. Naval combat is wonderful! The introducion of a research tree and the regional resources are great ideas! The games simulate combat so well that the player find himself to do the same tactical choices of a 18th century commander! WOW!
BUT..... this last episode has some annoying things:
- little music: one of the strongest point of the TW Series is almost absent here. A note, considering the music in TW, quantity and quality of the musics are inversely proportional to the quantity and quality of graphics. Too bad! :-(
- you can play only in the 18th century! Only 200 turns of play. VERY BAD! Formation combat with muskets and cannons was common even in the 17th and 19th centuries, so why do the game focus on one century only? There is smell of a "Napoleonic Wars" or "US Civil War" or "Italian reunification" expansions in the air.. a pure commercial endeavour. :-(
- units are outrageously expensive to build and mantain! I know that this is somewhat historical, but how can the player conquer 40 territories in 200 turns with such a small number of troops? Even at easy difficulty level, it isn't so...easy.

0 0
Empire:Total war · by crawlroman ·

It would be easy to be just bowled over by how glorious Empire: Total War looks. Creative Assembly's signature series has always been big on spectacle, and Empire is no different. The battles are bigger and bloodier, only now you have the smoke of muskets and crack of 12-pounders to accompany your march across the known world. Don't let the color of charging Cossacks blind you to everything else going on here though, Empire is a major step forward for the entire Total War franchise.

The 18th century clearly posed a challenge for the developers. The earlier games were pointy-stick affairs, emphasizing melee combat with the occasional overpowered archer and lots of sieges. In this era, there can only be a few types of "guys with guns" units, so you can't have a technology system that unlocks more expensive units. On top of that, this is the Age of Sail and the early Industrial Revolution, so you have to work all that in, too.

In fact, the resultant changes are so great, that there is a distinct possibility that Empire is just too big. The size really hits you when you run into the half-minute load times between the battle and campaign maps -- long enough to make you rethink the entire idea of playing general as well as king. Battlefields are immense and the enemy can effectively hide from your advancing lines. The strategic AI now has to juggle so many tasks, that it moves its development in peculiar directions: building three madrassas in an entirely Muslim province or trying to trade Transylvania for Cuba when the deal makes no sense for anyone. Not to mention the occasional suicidal war between Dagestan and Russia.

It's still worth sitting through these boneheaded campaign moves, because the strategic map is a much more interesting place now. Economic development happens outside of your provincial capitals. Towns and resources are scattered across the landscape, bringing wealth, knowledge or religion to your province. As the population grows, new towns and docks spring up, giving you new avenues to explore. Research limits how far you can upgrade these spots, and upgrades, in turn, open up new possibilities for research. The philosophical technology track is a double edged sword -- giving you new possibilities for revenue but also stirring up the masses. It is these connections between game mechanics that separate Empire from the rest of the franchise. Yes, the sea battles are cool, but they matter because control of the seas means control of trade. There's nothing worse than relying on overseas income and having it all vanish in an instant because someone plops a fleet on a sea lane. If you can't crack an enemy fort or beat him on the battlefield, you may pillage exposed towns until you are strong enough to fight or he is poor enough to quit. More than any other Total War game, Empire is a system of moving parts that fit together to build a world larger than cities to pillage and hills to climb. The agents are mostly useless (why should a scholar duel at all?), but they are thankfully less trouble to manage thanks to an improved interface.

The battles are fine, but they always are. The AI does a good job of using the terrain to its advantage, holing up behind fences or rushing into buildings for protection. It shows no hesitation in charging cavalry toward unprotected cannon, forcing you to guard your deadliest weapons on the battlefield. There is little reason to do more than point your guns in the right direction (ammo never seems to be a problem), but timing the bayonet or saber charge still gives the thrill of man-on-man combat. Even then there is a trade off, since there's always the chance of friendly fire if your horses attack an enemy under bombardment from your own guns. There are still too many sieges, and too few Waterloos.

Empire overreaches in parts, but I suppose that's the price of ambition. It will get even more ambitious once Creative Assembly adds the promised multiplayer campaign mode. But Empire's lumbering remoteness says something about the age it portrays: a century of mass armies and big ideas, the Wealth of Nations and age of steam. For all its problems, it's undoubtedly progress.

0 0
Empire Total War · by massgamer ·

I have played this game for 3+ days now and I have to say it is amazing. Great interface, Epic scale, stunning visual design. This game leaves nothing out of the mix.

Graphics: 10
Sound: 9.5
Music: 10
Overall: 9.9

0 0

Free to play games